Sunday, September 23, 2012

Gustav Klimt



In 1897 Klimt led a group of young Austrian artists and architects who resigned from the Vienna Künstlerhaus (Artists' house), the exhibition venue dominated by established academic artists. Calling themselves the "Secession," they set out not only to revolutionize the visual arts, but all of aesthetic life. 

By 1898 the Secessionists had begun their own periodical, Ver Sacrum ("Sacred Spring"), and erected their own exhibition hall, where they showcased their own art and brought international avant-garde art to Vienna. During the early years of the Secession, Klimt's style and philosophical outlook underwent defining change.

A New Style

Klimt's talent as a graphic designer was especially evident in the early years of the Secession. He was then eschewing three-dimensional space and developing an increasingly linear and planar mode of representation, inspired by the linearity and raw power of Greek vase painting and Japanese woodcuts.
Fish Blood / Klimt
Fish Blood is Klimt's greatest work of graphic design and a seminal artistic statement for him. Its imagery embodies Klimt's metaphysical view of life as endless floating form. Cropped on all four sides, the composition flows diagonally upward, having no beginning or end. The figures seem ethereal, with their long hair becoming one with their aqueous medium. The subject matter of erotic female nudes floating through water or space would remain a consuming interest for Klimt. 

Stylistically, the drawing above is characterized by a soft focus, which reflects Symbolism's influence on Klimt. He shows a pretty young woman from a close vantage point, as she relaxes on a couch and gazes languidly outward. Her head and the top of the couch occupy nearly the whole of the picture plane. Her ovoid face with its cloud of hair is at once captivating and vague and is further set off by the high collar of her dress. The flat couch back accentuates the physical and psychological barrier between the viewer and this dreamy beauty.

The Faculty Paintings

The new Vienna University opened in 1884. Klimt and his colleague Franz Matsch, with whom he had worked at the New Burgtheater, were commissioned to make the ceiling paintings for the university's grand reception hall. Matsch was to paint the centerpiece, The Triumph of Light over Darkness, and the corner painting representing the faculty of Theology. Klimt was to execute the three other Faculty Paintings representing Philosophy, Medicine, andJurisprudence.
Oil sketch for 'Medicine' / Klimt
Floating Woman with a Hanging Arm and an Outstretched Arm / Klimt

No longer able to work in straightforwardly representational terms, Klimt developed a cosmic vision for these paintings of floating figures delivered up to a fate that was out of their control. He developed a radical approach to the nude, rejecting the fleshy three-dimensional beauty of the classical nude in favor of what may be called "nakedness," pointing to the elemental isolation and stark realities of the human situation. Scandalized by the nudity, the university rejected Klimt's paintings, and they were never hung.

In the oil sketch for Medicine, above left, Klimt placed Hygieia, goddess of medicine, at the bottom. Behind her is the stream of suffering humanity containing figures, including Death at the top right. To the left is a floating female nude, while a muscular man shown from behind extends his arm to support her. The oil sketch shows traces of Klimt's earlier academic style in the curvaceous forms of the figures and the dramatic lighting of the stream of humanity.

The floating woman preoccupied Klimt as he worked and reworked Medicine in drawings, such as the one above, right. His main interest was in streamlining her form so that she seemed to levitate effortlessly in a dream state, which is emphasized by his trailing out the lines and omitting her feet and hands. This floating woman is at once seductive and mysterious, sensual and yet unreal.

Tuesday, September 18, 2012

FROM THE A-SPOT TO G-SPOT: UNDERSTANDING ORGASMS

FROM THE A-SPOT TO G-SPOT: UNDERSTANDING ORGASMS

A veteran researcher translates science into sexual healing in her new book, The Orgasm Answer Guide

BY VIRGINIA VITZTHUM JUNE 4, 2010


Orgasms
Len Lagrua

Best known for popularizing and naming the G-spot (after the researcher Ernst Gräfenberg, who first wrote about it in 1950), Beverly Whipple, PhD, has spent more than 30 years studying pleasure—largely, she says, "in order to validate women's experience." Written in collaboration with three other sexperts, Whipple's sixth book, the new Orgasm Answer Guide, is exhaustive, sweetly sex-positive, and funny in that unflappable science-nerd way: "One might wonder about the duration of the perceptual orgasm in a male pig...." (Well, you will when you find out that male pigs' breath paralyzes female pigs!)Answer Guide touches on subjects Whipple has researched for decades, including women with spinal-cord injuries, many of whom thought they'd never come again. About one such experiment, Whipple says: "We had the injured woman self-stimulate her cervix, her G-spot and her breasts. (Her breasts were above her injury.) She had 12 orgasms. She cried; I cried; it was very moving." The book also covers "nongenital" orgasms, including "thinking off" climaxes sparked just by mental imagery (plus those generated by prayer, meditation, childbirth, and "stimulation of lip, nipple, shoulder, or toe"). Other fun facts: An orgasm burns only two or three calories; men ejaculate on average after two to 10 minutes of intercourse; a woman's risk of breast cancer is lower the more sex partners she's had; and, perhaps best of all, the G-spot may have some company down there. The A-spot (located between the G-spot and the cervix) and the U-spot (just above and around the urethra) may also have pleasure generating potential.
ELLE : What made you choose a career in sex research?
Beverly Whipple: A student asked me in a nursing class I was teaching in the early '70s, "What can a man do sexually after he has a heart attack?" The board of trustees of the program said I couldn't talk about it. So I quit my job and went to graduate school. I got a master's in counseling, a master's in nursing, and a PhD in psychobiology.
ELLE : What do most women ask you?
BW: My research into the G-spot came from women who ejaculated and said, "Am I normal?" Every woman is unique; we have to be able to feel good about what brings us pleasure. You can't enjoy it if you think something's wrong with you.
ELLE : Does everyone have a G-spot?
BW: I don't know. We studied 400 women and they all did, but not everybody liked it being stimulated. One interesting finding is that self-stimulation of the G-spot produces a strong pain-blocking effect. Just
putting pressure on the area elevates pain thresholds—but not tactile thresholds— about 40 percent; with pleasurable stimulation, the threshold rises between 80 and 100 percent.
ELLE : I'd never heard of a cervical orgasm. Can anybody have one?
BW: We can't say for sure. Some women describe their orgasms from different forms of stimulation—clitoral, G-spot, vaginal, cervical—as feeling different to them. Our study of cervical orgasms started with women with spinal-cord injuries, but then some women without injuries said, "Oh, I've never felt that before," when they rhythmically pushed on their cervix, and the same areas of the brain were activated in women with and without injury. It helps prove that there are many nerve pathways that can help a woman experience orgasm— that orgasm isn't just a reflex.
ELLE : You tell people not to obsess about finding the G-spot or having simultaneous orgasms.
BW: We don't use the words reach or achieve with orgasm in the book; we use experience. You shouldn't strive for this or that, just enjoy yourself. Women can have pleasure and satisfaction without orgasm. The last chapter of our 1982 book on the G-spot was called "The Best Is the Enemy of the Good."

Monday, September 17, 2012

Relationship Anarchy

Relationship Anarchy – Multiple Relationships with Consent

When in a relationship, it is the love between the two that binds them. But, why does it have to be only two in a relationship, why not three if not more? 

This question is what gives rise to the term relationship anarchy. The neologism, relationship anarchy or relational anarchy, also shortly referred to as RA, questions the very idea of real love which is limited to two people in a relationship at one point of time. In fact, RA suggests that true love can be possible with more than one person at a time. Seems like Keira Knightley is only exploring the realm of relationship anarchy then!
The Ideal Relation
If my statement doesn’t seem far fetched, an ideal relationship, or the love that blossoms between two people, runs on a certain set of rules and regulations-
  • be loyal to the person with who you are into a relation with at the moment
  • you are not supposed to love or enter into into a relation if you are already seeing someone else or are already married
  • compromising in a relationship is inevitable, it is the price we pay for being together
The above set of rules and regulations are what define a monogamous relationship, the ideal relationship that is deemed fit by the society. Break these rules, and you are a sinner. Loyalty, faith, possessiveness, trust and to certain extent, even obsession are what define true love, and it is possible if we adhere to the above mentioned societal rules about an ideal relationship.
Open Relationship
Humans need constant change, in everything, so why not the way in which we maintain a relationship. May be this kind of thinking is what led to polyamory, or more simply known as an open relationship.
Polyamory or an open relationship is defined as being in intimate relationships with multiple partners at the same time. So, is it not sedition? I actually missed a crucial part in the definition, which is ‘consent‘. Everyone involved in the relationship would have to express their consent about having multiple partners. If approved, it’s no sedition.
Relationship anarchy also follows the same lines, with subtle differences though.
Relationship Anarchy
True love does not happen just once at one time and with one person – this is take of relationship anarchs. They believe that being in love with multiple persons at the same time is possible. For anarchs, love has no barricades and no rules, and the intimate feeling can be shared with more than one person at a time.
Not necessarily do the relationships need to be physical but, one can share the same attachment and emotions with another.
Polyamory v Relationship Anarchy
As mentioned above, both the terms are more or less the same but, RA is different. How is it different?
In polyamory, you are in multiple relationships with consent but, the relationships are categorized into outside marriage, friendship, physical relationships and so on.
In RA, there is no such categorization. No partner is primary nor secondary. So, multiple affairs, friendships, sexual relationships etc can all be had at the same time.
Basically, there are no commitments in RA.
Principles of RA
Unlike the societal rules of an ideal relationship, relationship anarchy is based on a few principles-
  • loving more than one person without categorizing them is possible
  • love has to be selfless and should not set boundaries in each others paths
  • no need to compromise for the individuals you love, only learn to respect their views
  • do not do anything in the relationships because you have to but, do it because you want to
  • learn to fight the norms of monogamy
Just like any other relationship out there, be it heterosexual, bisexual, homosexual or lesbian, relationship anarchy also exists. At least one thing with RA is that no one feels cheated as there is the most important consent and openness about the relationships from all the partners involved.
Relationship Anarchy On Facebook 

Google <are humans monogamous>

http://tinyurl.com/are-humans-monogamous

Relationship Anarchy – Multiple Relationships with Consent

Relationship Anarchy – Multiple Relationships with Consent

When in a relationship, it is the love between the two that binds them. But, why does it have to be only two in a relationship, why not three if not more? This question is what gives rise to the term relationship anarchy. The neologism, relationship anarchy or relational anarchy, also shortly referred to as RA, questions the very idea of real love which is limited to two people in a relationship at one point of time. In fact, RA suggests that true love can be possible with more than one person at a time. Seems like Keira Knightley is only exploring the realm of relationship anarchy then!

The Ideal Relation

If my statement doesn’t seem far fetched, an ideal relationship, or the love that blossoms between two people, runs on a certain set of rules and regulations-

  • be loyal to the person with who you are into a relation with at the moment
  • you are not supposed to love or enter into into a relation if you are already seeing someone else or are already married
  • compromising in a relationship is inevitable, it is the price we pay for being together

The above set of rules and regulations are what define a monogamous relationship, the ideal relationship that is deemed fit by the society. Break these rules, and you are a sinner. Loyalty, faith, possessiveness, trust and to certain extent, even obsession are what define true love, and it is possible if we adhere to the above mentioned societal rules about an ideal relationship.

Open Relationship

Humans need constant change, in everything, so why not the way in which we maintain a relationship. May be this kind of thinking is what led to polyamory, or more simply known as an open relationship.

Polyamory or an open relationship is defined as being in intimate relationships with multiple partners at the same time. So, is it not sedition? I actually missed a crucial part in the definition, which is ‘consent‘. Everyone involved in the relationship would have to express their consent about having multiple partners. If approved, it’s no sedition.

Relationship anarchy also follows the same lines, with subtle differences though.

Relationship Anarchy

True love does not happen just once at one time and with one person – this is take of relationship anarchs. They believe that being in love with multiple persons at the same time is possible. For anarchs, love has no barricades and no rules, and the intimate feeling can be shared with more than one person at a time.

Not necessarily do the relationships need to be physical but, one can share the same attachment and emotions with another.

Polyamory v Relationship Anarchy

As mentioned above, both the terms are more or less the same but, RA is different. How is it different?

In polyamory, you are in multiple relationships with consent but, the relationships are categorized into outside marriage, friendship, physical relationships and so on.

In RA, there is no such categorization. No partner is primary nor secondary. So, multiple affairs, friendships, sexual relationships etc can all be had at the same time.

Basically, there are no commitments in RA.

Principles of RA

Unlike the societal rules of an ideal relationship, relationship anarchy is based on a few principles-

  • loving more than one person without categorizing them is possible
  • love has to be selfless and should not set boundaries in each others paths
  • no need to compromise for the individuals you love, only learn to respect their views
  • do not do anything in the relationships because you have to but, do it because you want to
  • learn to fight the norms of monogamy

Just like any other relationship out there, be it heterosexual, bisexual, homosexual or lesbian, relationship anarchy also exists. At least one thing with RA is that no one feels cheated as there is the most important consent and openness about the relationships from all the partners involved.


Saturday, September 8, 2012

Katy Perry - E.T. ft. Kanye West

Katy Perry - E.T. ft. Kanye West





"E.T."
(feat. Kanye West)

[Kanye West - Verse 1]
I got a dirty mind
I got filthy ways
I'm tryna bathe my ape, (ape),
In your milky way (way)
I'm a legend
I'm irreverent
I be reverend
I'll be so faaaaa-ar up
We don't give a fuuuh-uh-uck
Welcome to the danger zone
Step into the fantasy
You are not invited to the other side of sanity
They're callin' me an alien a big headed astronaut
Maybe it's because your boy Yeezy get ass a lot

[Katy Perry]
You're so hypnotizing
Could you be the devil?
Could you be an angel?
Your touch magnetizing
Feels like I am floating
Leaves my body glowing

They say, be afraid
You're not like the others
Futuristic lover
Different DNA
They don't understand you

[Bridge]
You're from a whole other world
A different dimension
You open my eyes
And I'm ready to go
Lead me into the light

[Chorus:]
Kiss me, kiss me
Infect me with your love and
Fill me with your poison
Take me, take me
Wanna be your victim
Ready for abduction
Boy, you're an alien
Your touch so foreign
It's supernatural
Extraterrestrial

You're so supersonic
Wanna feel your powers
Stun me with your laser
Your kiss is cosmic
Every move is magic

You're from a whole other world
A different dimension
You open my eyes
And I'm ready to go
Lead me into the light

[Chorus:]
Kiss me, kiss me
Infect me with your love and
Fill me with your poison
Take me, take me
Wanna be a victim
Ready for abduction
Boy, you're an alien
Your touch so foreign
It's supernatural
Extraterrestrial

[Kanye West - Verse 2]
I know a bar out in Mars
Where they drivin' spaceships instead of cars
Cop a prada space suit about the stars
Getting stupid hah, straight up out the jars
Pockets on shrek, rockets on deck
Tell me what's next? Alien sex.
Imma disrobe you
Then Imma probe you
See I've abducted you
So I'll tell you what to do
I tell you what to do (what to do, what to do)

[Katy Perry]
Kiss me, kiss me
Infect me with your love and
Fill me with your poison
Take me, take me
Wanna be a victim
Ready for abduction
Boy, you're an alien
Your touch so foreign
It's supernatural
Extraterrestrial

Extraterrestrial
Extraterrestrial

Boy, you're an alien
Your touch so foreign
It's supernatural
Extraterrestrial

Sunday, September 2, 2012

I am hollow



Have you no heart?
No,
I have no heart!
I feel no love!
Nor fear...
nor joy...
nor sorrow!
I am hollow.

Dracula On Van Helsing Movie

min 34:44

http://nobuffer.info/sc.php?url=4ECF9E3977A62C3A

Metallica - The Unforgiven


Metallica - The Unforgiven

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xgrl9S6HtK8





What I've felt ... What I've known
Never shined through in what I've shown
Never Free ... Never Me ... !

Mercan Dede

Only Union with The You Gives Joy ... Edited

If you want to dive into hauntingly beautiful world ...
Mercan Dede on Youtube
Mercan Dede on Wikipedia

Mercan Dede - Istanbul
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W7aIdw-drtM


Mercan Dede Feat Dhafer Youssef
http://youtu.be/GkjeUi4kkJg

Mercan Dede Track List

Mercan Dede - Istanbul Download MP3
Mercan Dede - Book of Wings Download MP3
Mercan Dede - NAPAS Download MP3

Voting ... Does it work?



here is my take on the so called democracy
it is the narcotic that giving us the feeling of
being able to take our own decisions

but the fact is
we go vote for another puppeteer
another idiot instead of the current idiot
and usually nothing change

come on we are in the time of internet
and e-voting could be possible

I vote for future Direct Democracy

Read more
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Direct_democracy

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Direct_democracy#Switzerland

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Representative_democracy

Monday, August 13, 2012

About Civilization - Will Durant




A great civilization is not conquered from without

until it has destroyed itself within
- Will Durant

appeared as the opening graphic of Mel Gibson's 2006 film Apocalypto

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Will_Durant#Philosophical_writings

Hence a certain tension between religion and society
marks the higher stages of every civilization.

Religion begins by offering magical aid to harassed and bewildered men
; it culminates by giving to a people that unity of morals and belief

which seems so favorable to statesmanship and art
; it ends by fighting suicidally in the lost cause of the past

- Will Durant